The global financial sector runs on digital infrastructure. This growing reliance has been a catalyst for innovation, but it has also created systemic risks that regulators are now moving decisively to address. For years, firms have operated with the knowledge that comprehensive digital oversight was coming; now, it has arrived.
The European Union’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is that major step. While its principles have been discussed for months, a recent circular (LC 25/1) from Luxembourg’s insurance authority, the Commissariat aux Assurances (CAA), has translated abstract requirements into concrete, immediate actions. This communication reveals several urgent takeaways for financial entities, clarifying what compliance looks like on the ground. This article breaks down the four most surprising and pressing realities from this official guidance.
1. The Clock Is Ticking: Deadlines Are Immediate, Not Abstract
DORA is no longer a future concept to be managed by a long-term strategic plan. According to the CAA’s letter, the regulation is fully applicable starting January 17, 2025. This marks the official beginning of the compliance period.
More importantly, the circular establishes the first critical deadline with startling speed. Insurance and reinsurance companies are required to submit their first “Register of Information” detailing their ICT providers to the CAA by April 18, 2025. This register must reflect the firm’s complete ICT landscape as of March 31, 2025. This gives firms just 18 days to finalize, format, and submit a comprehensive data set based on a snapshot taken less than three weeks prior. This deadline forces firms to have a complete, auditable inventory of their ICT providers and contractual arrangements before Q1 2025 even ends. This condensed timeline is made even more challenging by the highly specific technical requirements for the submission itself.
2. The Net Is Wider Than You Think: It’s Not Just for Industry Giants
A common misconception about major EU regulations is that they are designed primarily for large, systemic institutions. The CAA circular decisively refutes this notion for DORA. It clarifies that the regulation’s scope extends far beyond just major insurance and reinsurance corporations.
The circular explicitly states that the following entities are also in scope:
- Insurance intermediaries
- Reinsurance intermediaries
- Ancillary insurance intermediaries
This clarification is critical. Many smaller firms, such as brokers or agents, might have mistakenly believed they were exempt from such a significant piece of legislation. This confirmation means smaller intermediaries must now allocate resources to DORA compliance with the same urgency as multinational insurers, a requirement many may not have budgeted for.
3. It’s All About Your Supply Chain: Regulators Are Now Looking at Your Tech Vendors
One of DORA’s most significant shifts is its focus on the digital supply chain. The requirement for firms to maintain and submit a “Register of Information” on their technology providers is the primary mechanism for this.
The circular states the explicit purpose of this register: it is designed to help European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) identify and ultimately designate “critical ICT third-party providers.” The CAA has mandated its April 18 deadline for firms precisely because it must consolidate this data and submit it to the ESAs by April 30, 2025. This demonstrates a rigid, system-wide dependency where delays at the firm level are not an option. This transforms third-party risk management from an internal diligence exercise into a matter of direct regulatory supervision, fundamentally altering how firms must approach vendor selection, contract negotiation, and ongoing performance monitoring.
Discover our DORA Register of Information solution : Dora Register Of Information – Export RoI with 1 click
4. Compliance Is a Technical Challenge, Not Just a Policy Update
The CAA circular makes it clear that DORA compliance cannot be achieved by simply updating policy documents. The new reporting requirements are highly technical and prescriptive, demanding direct engagement from technology and data teams.
The regulation establishes a dual-phase system for reporting major ICT-related incidents. Initially, notifications of major incidents can be sent by email to [email protected] using either a provided Excel template or a JSON format, before a mandatory transition in March 2025 to formal channels using a newly created reporting type: ‘DORA Incident Reporting’ (DIN).
Furthermore, the format for the Register of Information is exceptionally specific, requiring a “package of files JSON & CSV” that must adhere to a detailed technical taxonomy and pass validation rules defined by European authorities. This level of technical detail shows that DORA compliance is not a task for legal or policy teams alone. It requires direct involvement from IT and data engineering specialists to build, format, and transmit these specific reporting packages correctly and on time.
Conclusion
The guidance from Luxembourg’s insurance authority transforms DORA from a set of high-level principles into a series of immediate, far-reaching, and technically demanding obligations. The tight deadlines, broad scope, supply chain focus, and specific data formats confirm that the era of digital operational resilience is here. The CAA’s guidance proves that the time for high-level strategic planning is over; the focus must now shift to immediate, cross-functional technical implementation involving legal, compliance, and IT engineering teams.
With regulators now demanding deep technical transparency, is your organization’s view of its own digital dependencies clear enough to stand up to scrutiny?
CAA Circular : https://www.caa.lu/uploads/documents/files/LC25-01_FR.pdf
